Skip to main content

Am I a bad manager?

1 / 24

I take charge

This is not a screen for any condition. It measures normal differences between people.

What this quiz measures

The word bad is a poor starting point for management. It turns a job of repeated choices into a verdict on a person. A more useful question is what it is like to work with you when priorities conflict, a deadline slips, or somebody brings unwelcome news. Do people leave a meeting knowing who decides and what happens next? Can they disagree without paying for it later? This check looks at tendencies that shape firmness, patience, organisation, care for other people, and how you respond when frustrated.

Begin with evidence your team can see. Look at one recent project: were expectations written down, were decisions made at the right level, did you remove obstacles, and did you explain changes before people discovered them themselves? Ask for feedback about a specific behaviour rather than an overall rating. 'When do I make your work harder than it needs to be?' gets a more useful answer than 'How am I doing?' A manager can be warm and still leave people without direction; decisive and still make it safe to surface a risk.

Choose one practice to test for two weeks. It might be ending every meeting with an owner and date, asking the quietest person for a dissenting view, or sharing the reason behind a change. Tell the team what you are trying and invite correction. The result can suggest where your usual style may make this easier or harder. It cannot judge a team member, repair an understaffed department, or assess a workplace whose incentives reward poor management.

The six things it looks at

The six measured parts cover directness, compromise, concern for others, response to irritation, reliability, and preference for clear systems. They matter most in the ordinary moments that rarely appear in a leadership course.

Assertiveness

Speaking up, taking the lead, and being comfortable telling other people what to do.

Most people score between 10 and 19 out of 20.

  • Take charge.
  • Try to lead others.
  • Take control of things.
  • Wait for others to lead the way.

Cooperation

How much you would rather compromise than fight, and what it takes to make you fight.

Most people score between 10 and 20 out of 20.

  • Love a good fight.
  • Yell at people.
  • Insult people.
  • Get back at others.

Sympathy

Tender-mindedness — how far other people's hardship registers as your problem too.

Most people score between 11 and 19 out of 20.

  • Sympathize with the homeless.
  • Feel sympathy for those who are worse off than myself.
  • Am not interested in other people's problems.
  • Try not to think about the needy.

Anger

How fast frustration turns hot when something gets in the way, and how visible that is to everyone else.

Most people score between 7 and 18 out of 20.

  • Get angry easily.
  • Get irritated easily.
  • Lose my temper.
  • Am not easily annoyed.

Dutifulness

How binding a rule or a promise feels once you have accepted it.

Most people score between 13 and 19 out of 20.

  • Keep my promises.
  • Tell the truth.
  • Break rules.
  • Break my promises.

Orderliness

How much structure you keep around you: lists, systems, clear surfaces.

Most people score between 7 and 18 out of 20.

  • Like to tidy up.
  • Often forget to put things back in their proper place.
  • Leave a mess in my room.
  • Leave my belongings around.

What this is built on

Defaults runs on the IPIP-NEO-120, a public-domain 120-item Big Five inventory developed by Dr John A. Johnson. Each short quiz uses 24 of its actual items, word for word, and scores them against Johnson's published adult norm tables rather than rescaled against your own answers. The same 24 count toward the full 120.

This page uses public-domain personality items to describe tendencies. It is not a 360 review, performance assessment, or measure of a team's workload and organisational context.

  • Johnson, J. A. (2014). Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120-item public-domain inventory. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.003
  • International Personality Item Pool. https://ipip.ori.org/

Common questions

Can a quiz tell whether my team trusts me?

No. Confidence in a manager belongs to the relationship and needs direct evidence: what people tell you, whether they raise risks early, turnover, and the quality of disagreement. Use this result to frame a question, then listen to the answer without arguing it away.

What feedback should I ask for?

Ask about a recent event and one observable behaviour. For example: 'When priorities changed last week, what would have helped you respond sooner?' Specific examples make a pattern discussable and make it easier to choose a next action.

What if the team is underperforming?

Do not assume the explanation is personality. Check goals, resources, role clarity, incentives, and whether people can report problems. A difficult conversation about standards may be necessary, but it works better when the work and decision rights are explicit.

What should I do after the result?

Pick one recurring situation where your team pays a cost: unclear handoffs, late decisions, unchecked conflict, or silence. Change one behaviour there, tell people what you changed, and ask whether the result is different. Management improves through visible repetition.

How this page was written